On February 8, 2024, City Councilmember Jim Harrity (At Large) reintroduced legislation that would implement new protections for building service workers, including subcontracted workers, who are “displaced” when the properties where they are employed are sold or closed, with an eye toward office-to-residential building conversions in Center City. The current version of the bill is co-sponsored by Councilmembers Mark Squilla (District 1), Jamie Gauthier (District 3), Curtis Jones (District 4), Mike Driscoll (District 6), Cindy Bass (District 8), Kendra Brooks (At Large), Rue Landau (At Large), Nicolas O’Rourke (At Large), and Isaiah Thomas (At Large) and has been referred to the Committee on Commerce & Economic Development.
The bill builds off of existing protections that were passed at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic and would require building service workers receive 15 days’ notice before the termination of any contract, 60 days’ notice of workplace closure, and 90 days’ retention by new building owners following a change in ownership or management. The bill would also require new building owners to offer building service workers their previous or similar positions once those positions become available again.
The revised legislation offers protections to various categories of employees including security, janitorial services, building maintenance, concierge services, door attendant services, food and beverage, hotel services, health care (including registered nurses), and parking employees. The bill would apply to buildings that are larger than 50,000 square feet or have more than 50 residential units.
While the bill was originally passed by City Council in December by a 14-1 vote — with Councilmember Brian O’Neill (District 10) casting the only “no” vote — the bill was pocket vetoed by outgoing Mayor Jim Kenney at the conclusion of his last term in office. The bill has been referred to the Committee of Commerce and Economic Development. The Parker administration has not indicated either support or opposition to the legislation as proposed.
About Cozen O’Connor Public Strategies
Cozen O’Connor Public Strategies, an affiliate of the international law firm Cozen O’Connor, is a bipartisan government relations practice representing clients before the federal government and in cities and states throughout the country. With offices in Washington D.C., Richmond, Albany, New York City, Philadelphia, Harrisburg, Chicago, and Santa Monica, the firm’s public strategies professionals offer a full complement of government affairs services, including legislative and executive branch advocacy, policy analysis, assistance with government procurement and funding programs, and crisis management. Its client base spans multiple industries, including healthcare, transportation, hospitality, education, construction, energy, real estate, entertainment, financial services, and insurance.
About Cozen O’Connor
Established in 1970, Cozen O’Connor has over 775 attorneys who help clients manage risk and make better business decisions. The firm counsels clients on their most sophisticated legal matters in all areas of the law, including litigation, corporate, and regulatory law. Representing a broad array of leading global corporations and middle-market companies, Cozen O’Connor serves its clients’ needs through 31 offices across two continents.
Explore Articles and News
See All News-
Broad Street Brief: City Council Talks Land Bank, SEPTA Support
April 17, 2025
City Hall Mayor Parker’s Housing Plan Relies on $800M in Bonds Mayor Cherelle Parker’s Housing Opportunities Made Easy (HOME) Initiative aims to build or...Read More -
Pennsylvania Perspective for Thursday, April 17, 2025
April 17, 2025
Pennsylvania Gov. Shapiro Addresses Arson Incident During a press conference following the opening of the Hershey Corporation’s new manufacturing plant, Governor Josh Shapiro made...Read More -
Cozen Cities – April 16, 2025
April 16, 2025
Technology & Gig Economy BALTIMORE—City Files Lawsuit Against DraftKings, FanDuel The City of Baltimore filed a lawsuit against DraftKings and FanDuel, alleging that the...Read More